0311 Civilizations 750,000 to 300,000 BCE

Civilizations 750,000 to 300,000 BCE

Originally posted by Geraldine on March 11, 2013.

The Project - Inquiring into civilizations during 750,000 to 300,000 BCE (Part 4 of Young Soul Age)

[Note from Geraldine: This was another 2 hour session that had well over an hour of pauses. This material is very slow going. But, we get what we get, and keep compiling it. glb]

[GeraldineB]
Hello, Michael. I'd like to continue with what I've come to call "The Project" -- or our Grand Cycle on Earth. I'm going to ask several questions, but one at a time.

You've mentioned multiple civilizations rising and falling during the period of time between 750,000 BCE and 250,000 BCE. I would like to pin this down.

I would like a listing of the major civilizations of the more evolved lines that occurred up until the more modern era of approximately 10,000 BCE. As part of the listing, I'd like to know what they may have been called, when, where they were located, and approximate population size. And, what caused them to fall. I need a framework for asking more specific questions.

MEntity: To be as specific as possible would require several intensive exchanges with you. We will begin with as comprehensive an overview as possible for the time frame requested.

[GeraldineB] thank you -- I'm always open to expanding and more exchanges

MEntity:

Once music and math became a part of our species' consciousness, the exponential evolution of many concepts were able to come about.

This kind of resonance in the brain allowed for resonance beyond survival.

It allows for the bodies of a species to find one another, to acknowledge resonance beyond necessity for reproduction and survival. It could be said to be the underpinning of Essence Recognition; to feel, hear, the "music" of another.

Many of the civilizations we would consider to have been rather advanced are said to be so when matching several criteria: larger populations, various positions of contribution by members, the ability to produce/store foods, publicly-shared building structures, a system of symbols or writing, a focus on sciences (even if only by a few members), the expression of arts, a system of trade, a governing body.

These criteria were fulfilled by many civilizations, both large and small, in our history as a species, even if there is no remaining, or obvious, evidence of this.

These began to be attempted several times over once the seeding beyond Africa was implemented.

However, it was not until the notion of social structure that these were able to be sustained to any degree.

This is not to say that there were not civilizations before the seeding, as there would always be pockets of consciousness accelerating off and on, but these were rarer.

Key areas where civilizations have been given rise and fall are similar to key areas on the planet even now.

India, the Mediterranean coasts, what is now some great deserts, South and North Americas, China, Ethiopia, Israel, Bolivia, and many islands now long gone.

Because populations make up civilizations, it could be said that civilizations are something similar to incarnations, in that when a civilization dies, its members tend to return to rebuild together in some way.

They become collective entry points to the planet and bodies.

Our point being that some current civilizations can be traced back to other civilizations because of the majority of members populating them, and bringing with them the ideals of the previous civilizations.

We share this with you because as you begin to collect an emerging map through time of civilizations, we may then be able to share with you the "incarnations" of those civilizations. There is a system here that may be of interest once there is content to correlate.

[GeraldineB] Yes, I'm very interested. I see the correlation.

MEntity:

At approximately 750,000 years ago, the emerging civilizations of Atlantis and Mu were coming into formation. It could be said that these were the first civilizations of any fair significance to collective Human history. These took a long time to come into full formation, but they began around the same time.

Civilizations previous to this were meaningful, of course, but they would not shape humanity in the ways that later civilizations came to shape us.

[GeraldineB] Was that due to the fact that the epidemic nearly made humans extinct at 1 million BCE -- i.e., few left to remember the culture

MEntity:

The Mu and Atlantis civilizations would undergo their own starts and stops for about 300,000 years before coming into some formation that would be sustainable as a civilization.

It was not that the near-extinction would render previous civilizations less-influential, it is simply that once the majority of Humans began to experience, hear, produce music, song, and maths, the more cohesive and populated a civilization could be. The more people, the more influential in history.

Mu and Atlantis came to be precursors to what you might consider to be the "East" and the "West" of civilizations to come.

Teachings of Mu were able to be carried forth into practices of meditation, philosophies, and greatly intact in what is now known as Taoism, or Tao te ching, whereas Atlantis brought about the waves of emphasis on invention and external technology as representing internal worlds and realms.

Though there were civilizations before and after, it was the fall of both Mu and Atlantis that these influences were able to become such a widespread part of our humanity's historic influences.

The line of Atlantis, or Poseid, influence carried forward into civilizations that rose in the North and South Americas, and parts of Africa, giving rise to such civilizations as the Mayans and those along the shores of Peru and Chile.

The line of Mu carried forward into such civilizations as those in China's history, India's, and across Europe, in general.

A third line could be said to be those that remained rooted in Africa, where the conflicts between the two influences remain in conflict.

This is not a comprehensive look at these lines, but it gives you a general idea that can later be explored.

[GeraldineB] yes . . .it's why I'm holding back on more Qs

MEntity:

So it could be said that the more widespread establishment of civilizations began around 300,000 years ago, aside from the pockets of civilization that rose and fell previous to Atlantis and Mu.

There may only be weak or anomalous historic, evidential reference for you to cross with our information, and land mass has shifted along with coastlines over these thousands of years, but we can say that the greatest of the civilizations that were over that period of time in question were in these locations as known today:

The Eastern Coast of the United States.
 The Western Coast of South America.
 The coasts of the Mediterranean Sea.
 The Eastern and Southern coasts and islands of Asia.
 The "cradle" of Africa.

There is plenty of evidence in these areas to represent the "advanced" technologies, sciences, arts, and philosophies of the times, even if dismissed.

[GeraldineB] can I have an example? I was going to ask about Puma Punku in Bolivia

MEntity:

Though all civilization/areas we have mentioned fit the criteria of "civilization," and many were advanced beyond current presumption, it was not until approximately 77,000 years ago that a drastic leap was made in technologies that would allow for the manipulation of raw materials in a way that would grow to become quite differentiated from "natural."

In other words, though there was flight, electricity, housing, libraries, etc., previous to 77,000 years ago, it was not until after the 7th Manifestation of the Infinite Soul, and the subsequent "off-planet" reunion with ancestors that the cycle of technology leaps would begin.

[GeraldineB] I will save that for next time

MEntity:

This is when the introduction of a renewable, completely sustainable resource of energy was offered.

It allowed for great manipulation of environment like never before, and the emphasis/trend grew where the heaviest and most enduring of stone could be used and shaped for various reasons.

The mindset of humanity had always been quite in line with using the most natural of elements for even the most advanced of technologies in the past, so it was a natural transition to presume to use natural elements again, but on a grander scale than ever.

[GeraldineB] We're down to 15 min -- Is Mu the same thing as Lemuria (none of the information seems to jibe)

MEntity: Yes, "Mu" and "Lemuria" are often interchangeable. In what way does the information "not jibe" so that we may address it.

[GeraldineB]
Well, today, you indicated that our species incarnated into Mu but previously you've said they had their own Sphere of Essences.

Also, today, you indicated they "fell" -- but elsewhere you indicated that they all cycled off simultaneously

MEntity: No. We will clarify.

[GeraldineB] And, previously, you've said the those who would choose to become Lemurians (light-bodied species) -- that they actually tried to start on earth before the transfer -- they have a long history as unique species

MEntity:

Mu was of great influence over humanity's history and shape of civilizations. They were of a different species, and were the last of them. They did not cycle off "simultaneously," but took hundreds of years to do so. It was an exponential event, and in the context of time, it was quite fast. The civilization of Mu/Lemuria did fall. Once the population dwindled, the civilization fell. Remaining members spread out to teach and share as best they could.

In addition to this, both civilizations of Mu and Atlantis were destroyed by earthquakes.

Mu's remaining evidences of civilization were destroyed, even while no one was tending it at the time, while Atlantis' was interrupted with the destruction.

[GeraldineB]
Did they do anything to cause the earthquakes? or were they a matter of location and tectonic plates?

To put a fine point on this -- Were Lemurians part of our Design, but of a different "line" of our species -- one that never interbred with primates?

MEntity:

The destruction of Mu was "natural" in that it was a matter of geological shifts occurring unprovoked. Atlantis, however, was in the process of utilizing a form of energy that took a toll by its provocation of geological shifts.

We will conclude here for today. We know this is slow in coming through our channel, but we will continue to come forth with as detailed information as possible in response to your questions. It is difficult to clarify details about a history that is lost from any accessible references of validation.

[GeraldineB] yes, I'm beginning to figure that out -- but, still this is the story of our GC, too. Thank you.

As one can see, there are a whole lot of threads to pursue at some future time; PLUS, we've yet to get a full listing. Will continue next month. glb