American Origins II: Earliest Incarnations and Chakric Coastal Cities in North and South America

Private Live Chat
July 22, 2026

MEntity: Hello to you, Connor. We are here. We can begin.

ConnorB: 

Hello again, Michael

I would like to continue exploring the origins of human life in North America.

Last time, you focused on the most-recent wave of migrations that led to a continuous human presence in North America, namely the arrival of Homo sapiens via Beringia and a lost Atlantic route, ~120,000 - 20,000 BCE. You confirmed that humans had lived in North America well before these waves of migration, however. In an exchange with Jeroen, you recently described human activity in the Colorado Plateau area dating from around 700,000 to 450,000 years ago. You also said the networked chakric coastal civilizations from even further back (~1,000,000 BCE) had a North American presence too. And this has me wondering just how far into the past human activity in North America stretches.

I am going to ask you about the earliest origins of human activity in North America, but first I want to be crystal clear about terminology. When I say “human activity” in this context, I mean it from the perspective of Sentience, not species. It’s more of a philosophical definition than an anthropological one. The presence of any physical incarnation undertaken during this Grand Cycle by an Essence from our Design, regardless of the incarnation’s genetic lineage or star system of origin, counts as “human activity.” In that sense, even a Sirian past life, despite being of a different species from another world, is just as “human” as I am.

With that in mind, can you describe the first humans ever to live in North America after the transfer to Earth? In other words, the first incarnations on this continent by Essences from our Design. Who were these people, when did they arrive in North America, and how did they get here?

MEntity: 

First, we appreciate the distinction and it is important because the earliest incarnations of our Design in North America would predate Homo sapiens and would be bodies that are not anatomically modern humans. We would place the earliest such activity in North America approximately 1.3 to 1.5 million years ago. There were not yet sprawling networked coastal civilizations as would come around 1 million years ago. Those civilizations represented later development from populations established over time.

We think the earliest populations cam primarily from northeastern Asia, moving through the broad northern regions connecting what are now Siberia, Alaska, and northwestern North America. The geography and climate were different enough across these periods that it would be misleading to imagine the later Beringian migration route simply pushed backward by more than a million years. Movement occurred through changing terrestrial and coastal environments over many generations, rather than through one identifiable migration event. Some groups remain along northern and western coastal regions, while others gradually moved farther into the continent.

By roughly 1 million years ago, some descendants and subsequent populations had become incorporated into the extensive coastal civilization networks. By approximately 700,000 to 450,000 years ago, human activity had extended well into interior regions, including the Colorado Plateau.

These were not one uninterrupted civilization descending from and built by first arrivals, but successive populations within a very long history of occupation, contraction, migration, extinction, and renewed settlement.

Much later movements around 120,000 years ago included populations entering through northern and coastal routes. Those eventually contributed to the continuous population histories that are derived from much of the archeological records accessible to you today.

So we would say that the first embodiment of our Design would have been around 1.4 or 1.5 million years ago. We offer all of this as the history we perceive, and not as a correction that archeology should presently accept without evidence.

ConnorB: 

Of course.

What about South America? Would human activity in South America follow that same timeline?

I suppose another way of looking at that question is to consider if every human presence in South America came from a group that first passed through North America.

MEntity: Oh, certainly not. Some did, particularly among the later migrations that eventually established the continuous populations recognizable in your archeological record, but the deeper history was not exclusively north-to-south.

ConnorB: 

So there were some people who got to South America first, then migrated north?

If there were ancestor groups who peopled South America without first passing through North America, I'd love to know how they got across the ocean to arrive there.

MEntity: 

We see the earliest activity within approximately the same broad deep-time period as North America, though somewhat later at about 1.2 to 1.3 million years ago. Some of these populations were extensions of groups already established farther north and moving southward, particularly along Pacific coastal environments. There were also populations introduced into or reaching South America through other coastal networks. By the time of the extensive chakric civilization networks, both North and South America were participating in much broader planetary system of settlements and exchange.

Geography of 1 million plus years ago should not be imagined simply as your present continents with different sea levels. Coastlines, shelves, islands, waterways, and habitable corridors changed repeatedly. Maritime movement was also already part of some populations' lives. Movement into South America did not require every population to enter Alaska, travel through North America, cross Central America, and continue south.

ConnorB: 

Were the networked chakric civilizations, by virtue of having established a "much broader planetary system of settlements and exchange," capable of sailing across oceans?

Or did they stick to coastlines in small craft? I suppose they weren't exactly building ships like Spanish galleons.

MEntity: There were at least two major directions of early settlements. One was north to south, ultimately derived from populations moving out of northeastern Asia and through North America. The other was transoceanic and coastal, connected to wider settlement networks already operating across Pacific regions. These were not voyages comparable to later European exploration, with ships departing from one known nation and discovering another continent. There were incremental expansions of populations through coastal settlements, islands, maritime corridors, and changing landforms across many generations.

ConnorB: 

Oh, and I suppose Mu was still around at that time. An entire continent in the North Pacific that no longer exists.

Was that lost continent, which you have described as being the size of approximately two Australias, was that part of the trans-pacific migration route?

MEntity: Mu would have been an important component of what we have described as the trans-Pacific routes, yes, though we would not describe it simply as a convenient stepping stone between Asia and the Americas. Mu, along with other islands, exposed shelves, and other habitable regions that have since been submerged or altered, created a very different geography of human movement. Travel could occur incrementally from one inhabited region to another over many generations.

ConnorB: Can you elaborate upon approximately where the networked chakric coastal civilizations existed in the Americas and which chakras they expressed?

MEntity: 

A short hand reference would be:

Pacific Northwest / western Canada - Intellectual (throat)
California / western Mexico - Moving (solar plexus)
Eastern North American coast - Emotional (heart)
Western South America, particularly the Peru - Ecuador - northern Chile region - Instinctive (root)
Central America / Caribbean-facing regions - Higher Emotional (brow)
Mu - Higher Moving (sacral)
Eastern and southeaster Asia - Higher Intellectual (crown)

The Americas did not contain all chakric centers because the civilization itself was planetary. Of the 7 primary functions, 5 had significant expressions within what is now the Americas. The Higher Moving and Higher Intellectual were not missing, but were functions to which the American settlements were connected through the larger network.

ConnorB: Do different cities that share an overall coastline (Pacific NW and California/west Mexico, for example) touch each other? Like, is it one looooong city where, if you travel far enough, you don't actually leave the city but the chakric emphasis gradually shifts? Or is there a distinct 'break' or boundary between two different coastal cities?

MEntity: We would say they were distinct regions and settlements connected by inhabited corridors.

ConnorB: And just to confirm, the list you offered above was specific to the Americas and not meant to be an accounting of ALL chakric cities on Earth? Because you've also mentioned a Higher Intellectual city in the Egypt region, and a Root city in Atlantis in other exchanges.

MEntity: We understand. What we covered today is an accounting of the chakric expressions relative to the Americas. There were other centers elsewhere, often parallel expressions of the same centers.

ConnorB: Awesome, just making sure.

MEntity: 

At the time, these were intuitive developments across humanity, but over time, the principle failed. Civilization became increasingly organized around pressures such as survival after repeated collapses, territorial control, resource concentration, inherited authority, warfare, trade monopolies, and eventually political and economic structures that rewarded centralization differently.

However, the pattern did not completely disappear, as you can see modern cities often develop dominant functions, like being financial centers, intellectual centers, manufacturing centers, artistic or religious centers, etc.

We must conclude here for today. We have exhausted the focus of our channel.

Good day to you, Connor. Goodbye, for now.

ConnorB: Thank you!

+++

After writing an entire paragraph to define "human activity," I thought perhaps I have been in grad school for too long. But you really never know how Michael will interpret a question. The loose, broad definition of "human" I use here would probably cause an anthropologist to tear out their hair and tell me to get the hell out. But any history that takes reincarnation into account will branch across different species the further back in time you go.

When Michael reads "human," they seem to default to "Homo sapiens," but our current species is only about 300,000 years old. A broader definition of "human" could include all our extinct sibling-species with whom we shared the genus Homo, like neanderthalensis, denisovans, erectus, antecessor, habilis, floresiensis, etc. But that only goes back about 2 million years. Incarnations from 6 - 3 million years ago would have lived through bodies belonging to entirely different genii within the broader family of Hominins, such as genus Paranthropus or genus Orrorin. An anthropologist would not consider any of these past lives to be "human." So, when forming questions for Michael about ancient human origins, there is no such thing as being too specific.

This gets me thinking about what exactly it is that makes us "human." DNA is, well, unsatisfying as an answer, and anthropological species classifications are based on arbitrary distinctions anyway. What really makes us human are our Essences, as well as our lived experiences with each other while sharing a Design.

I would love to be alive for the day when a million-year-old hominin skeleton is discovered in the Americas. Michael answered my initial question really quickly, within the first 15-20 minutes, so we had more time than I expected to address how the chakric coastal cities fit into this narrative.

The map below shows approximate locations of the cities based on Michael's information, color-coded to each city's corresponding chakra/center. The orange-julius blob in the North Pacific is supposed to be Mu, and obviously I am guessing its shape and location. I just traced an outline of Australia, duplicated it, smushed the two Australias together, and plopped them where Michael said Mu used to be - somewhere between Japan, Hawaii, Papua, and the Aleutians.

This map represents only what Michael shared in this session, relative to the Americas. It is not meant to be a full map of all chakric cities across the globe at the time. That would be a great map to have eventually, though.

The prevailing view of human origins in South America holds that anyone in South America must have descended from an ancestor group that first passed through North America via Beringia. And this is true for anyone alive today in South America with indigenous ancestry. But for earlier waves of human activity, Michael indicated that it was possible, more than a million years ago, to bypass North America and migrate directly to South America via a trans-Pacific route. I can see how the Mu landmass might have aided migration along that route until Hawaii, at least, but beyond that? The logical place to go would be the Aleutian Islands into Beringia, but that would funnel you into the North American route. So there must have been another way.

It would have been much easier to get to Australia via southeast Asia and Indonesia when sea levels were lower. And there are a fair number of islands east of Australia from which you could string together a series of shorter journeys, like from the Solomons to Vanuatu, Fiji, Samoa, the Cook Islands, Tahiti/French Polynesia, to the Pitcairn Islands…but then there's a heck of a lot of open ocean between the Pitcairns and South America, interrupted only by lonely Rapa Nui (Easter Island). Perhaps Rapa Nui was less lonely more than a million years ago?

I am also wondering if Lemurians were around yet when these early travelers passed through the Mu continent and what kind of interactions they might have had if so.