2023 Michael & Petra via Troy!

MEntity Hello to you, Petra. We are here, now. We can begin.

PetraB:

October 11th 2023 Hello Michael via Troy!

The Centering of the Human Design, here are some excerpts what You have told us so far: Excerpts from  “Aliens 101” From Fringe Open Floor 12th January, 2015 Channeled by Troy Tolley 

MEntity: Though a species is not locked into a Centering, it is fair to say that species are easily Moving-Centered, Intellectually Centered, or Emotionally centered.The rarest of species is the Moving-centered, and these species tend to move into interplanetary travel first. Intellectually centered species, such as Humans, tend to go in either direction, either away from the interest in interplanetary travel altogether, or toward it at some point. Emotionally centered species rarely move toward any interests in off-planet travel. Though any given Sentient species will be comprised of variations of Centering, there does tend to be this culture of centering for the species. It can and does shift, but very slowly. For instance, Humans began with a long stretch in the Moving Center and then shifted to Intellectual and this has not changed since. So all progress for humanity has tended toward the expansion of the capacity for expression over the capacity for movement/travel.

MEntity: Contact was much easier in the past with Humans because of the long stretch of time being Moving Center based. There was a common baseline that could be used. Once Humans shifted toward the Intellect, which was approximately 750,000 years ago, the gap between Humans and off-planet species began to widen and become difficult to bridge. Interventions from caretaker species had to move into greater and greater discretion and stealth.

“The Pleiadians’ Great Awakening” from Origins:

Humans were highly emotional. It is similar to how Humans are toward fellow animals on Earth. Humans shifted their development away from emotions and prioritized intellect. This has led to all major divisions within the species, from classism to racism to economic disparity to religion to sexual repression, etc. The more emotional and active a human, the less-evolved they must be. Animals do not speak a human language that is recognized, therefore they are insignificant beings that must be controlled and harvested. What humans do to animals now is what Pleiadians did to other species, then. Your crisis is coming.

I'd like You to give me an overview in which order we started and then changed Centers as the Human Design, if possible with time-frame and how/why it came to be? As well as, an explanation, that Humans (as stated above) shifted their development away from emotions and prioritized intellect, are You saying there was a period where we were Emotionally centered?

MEntity: Humans launched into Sentience as Emotional. Most Infant Soul or "newly born" species begin as Emotional because this is the most developed of the Centers for that Sentience. The progression of evolution toward Sentience is the development of the Moving Center, then the Emotional, then the Intellectual. The Emotional Center is often the default for a new Sentience because the amount of time spent in that development leaves it as a strong Center for launching into fragmentation. It helps retain a sense of gravity to keep the species close together.

PetraB: So, we started emotional, then moving, and then intellectual.

MEntity: Humans launched into Emotional, but quickly shifted to a baseline of Moving during the transition to Earth, and then to Intellectual.

PetraB: Thank You!

MEntity: We can continue.

PetraB: Here is a short collection of what Historians have to say about the disappearance/destruction of the Library of Alexandria:

And so Alexandria’s library, and its disappearance, remains one of the greatest enigmas of ancient history. It could have contained everything. And, just as conceivably, it could have contained nothing. Its books were collateral damage in the civil war that turned the Roman Republic into an Empire. They were the victims of a Christian crusade against pagan learning. They fell foul of the absolutist policies of early Islamic fundamentalism. Each theory is put forward by one group of historians, only to be demolished by another.

Some say, for instance, that Caesar’s fire merely destroyed a warehouse filled with scrolls and parchments recently unloaded from the harbor. The story of fourth-century Christian vandalism is attacked as a misinterpretation or a deliberate manipulation of the sources to serve an anti-religious agenda on the part of enlightenment scholars like Edward Gibbon. And Ibn Al-Qifti’s account is exposed as a myth written out of political expediency: as libraries across the 12th-century Muslim world were dispersed and auctioned off to pay debts, Al-Qifti created the legend of the bathhouse fires to stress that it was less of a crime to sell books than to burn them. In the end, no one was responsible for the library’s destruction. That always happened sometime else, at the hands of someone else. Perhaps, suggest the whispers, it had never really existed in the first place.

Question: I'd like to know what "really" took place, what events led to the destruction of the Library, who did it, and/or was behind it, and when?

MEntity: 

We will tell you.

The accounts for the destruction of these libraries appear to be in conflict or contradictory only because there is a single moment or source in these assumptions. The library was destroyed over time, with several assaults on it and accidents. It was not a single moment or cause.

PetraB: So, all the mentioned above took part in it?

MEntity: Some variations of each were likely involved. Most of the events happened over time, but close enough together that attempts to recover were futile before the next assault or accident.

PetraB: Thank You

Question from Jeroen:

Michael, You talked about the instant presence technology, can You describe how it works, and if that technology fully replicates the sensory experience of being physically present at a different location?

MEntity: This technology is based on a light or photon-based tech [we are limited in the terminology we can use through this channel, especially as the technology does not exist in your time, so there are few references we can use] that can capture the presence of objects and bodies and these can be replicated at any location. The presence of the object or body on the receiving end is assembled with photon-tech that has a reaction that "hardens" the light when touched. This allows for physical sensation to be transmitted and shared.

PetraB: Could one have intercourse and get pregnant?

MEntity: 

No

The pressure threshold is fairly fragile as far as we know of the technology. For example, one can hug a person through instant presence, but if hugged too hard one would pass through the presence. We are uncertain if this is a limitation of the technology or a built-in safety feature that would prevent assaults. 

Contagions, procreation, etc. would not be effectively transmitted through this technology because the images are light replicas, not actual transmissions.

PetraB: One could feel touch, smell and taste?

MEntity: Touch and smell, and some range of taste due to the use of scent, but it is limited.

PetraB: Thank You Michael & Troy!

MEntity: Good day to you, Petra. Goodbye, for now.